Open Source, Open Standards and ReUse: Government Action Plan?

Yes, actually there is a document called “Open Source, Open Standards and ReUse: Government Action Plan“. This is the latest (Jan 27th 2010) statement from central government on the topic; previously an Open Source policy was hatched in 2004.

Really the document should be called “Open Source in ICT Procurement: Government Action Plan” as Open Standards get relatively little mention. Indeed, it would have been a more clear communication  if it had stuck to this scope. Having said this, there is evidence of a clear and purposeful approach. Here are a few snippets that I thought worthy of mention…

The Government will expect those putting forward IT solutions to develop where necessary a suitable mix of open source and proprietary products to ensure that the best possible overall solution can be considered. Vendors will be required to provide evidence of this during a procurement exercise. Where no evidence exists in a bid that full consideration has been given to open source products, the bid will be considered non compliant and is likely to be removed from the tender process.

“The agreement to the Cross Government Enterprise Architecture framework and its acceptance by the Government’s major IT suppliers has enabled the disaggregation of ‘closed’ business solutions into component requirements. This which allows sharing and reusing of common components between different lines of business.”

“We have clarified that we expect all software licences to be purchased on the basis of reuse across the public sector, regardless of the service environment it is operating within. This means that when we launch the Government Cloud, there will be no additional cost to the public sector of transferring licences into the Cloud.”

These, and much else in the document, show a clear focus on saving public money in the medium to long term. Great! The actions seem realistic from the point of view of implementation by public administrators. It will take some time but they seem to be pointing in the right direction and committed to fair comparison of OSS vs proprietary software.

There are also a number of references to “Open Source techniques and culture”. These deserve a “D: good effort” to my mind and are rher more challenging for government, civil servants etc. From my experience, Open Source culture and public administration culture (especially in central government) are not particularly close. That’s just the way it is and I’m glad that culture change isn’t the priority in this document. To be fair, they are trying and making some progress but I’m not expecting open email reflectors – e.g. Apache Foundation – to be anything but highly unusual and little things give it away such as the absence of any licence or IP assertion on the document, let alone a Creative Commons or GNU Copyleft licence.

In spite of the above qualifications: ‘good effort HMG CIO Council, keep at it!’ And in the medium term, there are some clear opportunities for open-minded suppliers who understand how to work with OSS in their portfolio.

There is also the Government ICT Strategy, which is the umbrella for the document I am referring to above. This includes lovely names such as the “G-Cloud” (government cloud) and “G-AS” (applications store) but I’ve not digested the content yet…

4 thoughts on “Open Source, Open Standards and ReUse: Government Action Plan?

  1. Keep up at the back, there… ;-)

    The Open Source Action Plan came out last year, was republished in revised form this year, and in both editions has been made available in commentable form on WriteToReply (current version at ). An advantage of the WriteToReply version of the document is that each section, and each paragraph has a unique URI, so if you want to tie your comments into a web of linked discussion, why not link to the appropriate section of the document directly ;-)

    The Government ICT Strategy is also available on WriteToReply –
    Please consider commenting directly on the strategy document – it was ‘officially’ supplied to us by the COI and is linked to from their website. If you prefer blogging any response on your own blog, please link to any corresponding paragraphs on the WrieToReply version of the document. If trackbacks are working, we should capture a link back to your comment automatically. If that doesn’t work, we’re looking at other ways of tracking links…

  2. I agree with my masters comments above – unless there is CIO oversight to departments procurements they will continue to favour their current overly expensive suppliers (who know where the bodies are buried). So CIO if you are really serious about this start auditing the procurements and sacking those who are not team pleyers.

    As a taxpayer I’m annoyed, never mind as an IT proffessional.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>