Comments on: UK Government Open Standards Consultation – CETIS Response http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/2012/05/02/uk-government-open-standards-consultation-cetis-response/ Cetis Blogs Wed, 07 Jan 2015 09:19:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 By: Adam Cooper’s Work Blog » Open Standards Board and the Cabinet Office Standards Hub http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/2012/05/02/uk-government-open-standards-consultation-cetis-response/#comment-90 Mon, 22 Apr 2013 17:00:07 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/?p=521#comment-90 […] has taken quite a while for the process to move from a shadow board and a consultation on policy (Cetis provided feedback), through an extension of the consultation to allay fears of bias in a stakeholder event, analysis […]

]]>
By: adam http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/2012/05/02/uk-government-open-standards-consultation-cetis-response/#comment-89 Fri, 04 May 2012 10:56:22 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/?p=521#comment-89 Travis – thanks for the comment.

Yes, I think examples like that do point to some kind of mandate to trigger coordinated action. It is similar to what we styles as “problem-first” in the responses; rather than seeing mandation as a being about a list of approved standards that should be used in procurement/development, see it as being about driving change. I’m also sure there are plenty of cases where there is no business case for standards adoption at an individual unit/agency level but where there is a whole-system benefit. That kind of model of intervention with mandatory requirement strikes me as being more effective than approved lists.

Cheers, Adam

]]>
By: Tavis Reddick http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/2012/05/02/uk-government-open-standards-consultation-cetis-response/#comment-88 Thu, 03 May 2012 15:52:38 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/?p=521#comment-88 The CETIS response seems very sound to me. Is there a case where mandation could be a useful motivator in getting an existing but outdated standard up to date, moving people to a later version of a standard, or encouraging divergent standards to converge (I am thinking about cases like W3C and WhatWG on HTML5)?

]]>
By: Simon Grant of CETIS » Reviewing the future for Leap2 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/2012/05/02/uk-government-open-standards-consultation-cetis-response/#comment-87 Wed, 02 May 2012 11:39:41 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/adam/?p=521#comment-87 […] report, recommendation 6 is one for the long term. It could perhaps be read in the context of the newly formed CETIS position on the recent Government Open Standards Consultation. There we note: Established public standards […]

]]>