Comments on: What can be conceptually modelled? http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2009/10/14/top-ontology/ Cetis blog Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:13:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 By: More competency | Simon Grant of CETIS http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2009/10/14/top-ontology/#comment-65 Fri, 04 Dec 2009 21:05:45 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/?p=141#comment-65 […] questions could easily relate to the essential nature of the concept in question. In the terms of my own top ontology, is the concept about the material world? Or is it a repeatable pattern, belonging to the world of […]

]]> By: Carlos Delgado Kloos http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2009/10/14/top-ontology/#comment-64 Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:19:54 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/?p=141#comment-64 Hi, Simon,

your post reminded me of a post I wrote 3 years ago. I have recovered it here:

http://cdkloos.blogspot.com/2007/11/this-is-my-first-post.html

You are very right, there are abstraction levels. But when speaking colloquially we sometimes collapse them, and that makes conceptual modelling more difficult…

Carlos

]]> By: Modélisation conceptuelle | IP blog http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2009/10/14/top-ontology/#comment-63 Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:39:42 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/?p=141#comment-63 […] “que peut-on modéliser?” ou, pour la poser dans les termes de Simon Grant (CETIS) dans ses travaux récents: “Existe-t-il un ensemble de catégories (une ontologie) facilement compréhensibles qui […]

]]>