Good?

I might take up “privacy” as an example later, but let’s see if anyone suggests anything else first.

Let’s try ‘Privacy’.

Thanks for this post, Simon – it’s made me think. I don’t profess to understand it all as it’s a bit ambiguous (in a good way – see http://dougbelshaw.com/ambiguity).

Unless I’ve got the wrong end of the stick then you’re (perhaps unintentionally) prescribing an ontology here. Instead of rehashing my arguments against this approach, perhaps have a look at this: http://dmlcentral.net/blog/doug-belshaw/ontology-web-why-i-learned-stop-worrying-and-love-learning-standards

Finally, I’d remind you of a conversation we had earlier this year about the ‘endorsement’ feature of the OBI which remains on the roadmap to be implemented post-MozFest. This will allow us to ‘let a thousand flowers bloom’ in terms of badged learning activities that align with the Web Literacy Standard. We (Mozilla or any other organisations) can subsequently endorse those that are perceived to align *well*.

Hope that helps!