Comments on: What is there to learn about standardization? http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2014/10/24/learning-about-standardization/ Cetis blog Tue, 22 Aug 2017 13:13:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 By: Scott Wilson http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2014/10/24/learning-about-standardization/#comment-24095 Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:52:04 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/?p=1570#comment-24095 Another topic that requires a more nuanced understanding is the relationship between open source and open standards, something I’ve covered here:

http://osswatch.jiscinvolve.org/wp/2013/03/21/open-source-meets-open-standards/

http://oss-watch.ac.uk/resources/openstandardsopensource

]]>
By: Scott Wilson http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/2014/10/24/learning-about-standardization/#comment-24094 Mon, 27 Oct 2014 13:49:06 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/asimong/?p=1570#comment-24094 A while back I had a go at writing some “research questions on standardisation” – here is what I came up with:

– why do some standards succeed and others fail?
– can we identify optimal conditions for engaging in standardisation?
– some standards are considered harmful: why, and how do we identify them?
– what governance structures are successful in attracting participation?
– what is the appropriate scale for a standard? For example, number of participants x complexity.
– is there a relationship between governance model of SSO and adoption/success?
– how can governments and their agencies participate in, and gain benefit from, standardisation?
– what is the nature of the relationship between R&D and standardisation? When does it become problematic?
– what do standards cost? How do you quantify the benefits?
– can we revise the conventional model of standardisation (i.e. the 3-box model)?
– are there tools that can improve the standards process? (writing, doc mgt, testing, feedback…)
– is the idea of a “standards incubator” worthwhile? (e.g. W3C CGs, CEN WSLT->TC)

]]>