Comments on: Comparing metadata requirements for OERs (part 3) http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/2009/09/02/comparing-metadata-requirements-for-oers-part-3/ Cetis Blogs Wed, 25 Jan 2012 12:47:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 By: Phil’s JISC CETIS blog» Blog Archive » About metadata & resource description (pt 1) http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/2009/09/02/comparing-metadata-requirements-for-oers-part-3/#comment-72 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:38:00 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/?p=496#comment-72 […] our online support session for the UKOER programme, some of which John has summarized (1 2 3), instead of giving participants a definition of what metadata is we gave them a choice and asked […]

]]> By: Lorna http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/2009/09/02/comparing-metadata-requirements-for-oers-part-3/#comment-71 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 15:23:45 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/?p=496#comment-71 A couple of thoughts. I can’t really see any easy way of reconciling application specific usage data with the idea of a canonical structured metadata record. Especially given that ukoer materials will be scattered across multiple applications. This is definitely getting into tracking. You’re right that a detailed investigation of tracking issues is a bit out of scope for us right now but we definitely want to capture those tracking issues that the programme surfaces.

Using OAI-ORE to associate distributed annotations is a very interesting idea. Definitely worth further exploration I would have thought.

]]> By: Twitted by ukoer http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/2009/09/02/comparing-metadata-requirements-for-oers-part-3/#comment-70 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:31:56 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/?p=496#comment-70 […] This post was Twitted by ukoer […]

]]> By: JohnR http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/2009/09/02/comparing-metadata-requirements-for-oers-part-3/#comment-69 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 09:21:49 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/johnr/?p=496#comment-69 I’ll note as a commment rather than as part of the text – this post feels incomplete to me, though I suspect a large part of this feeling maybe becasue I want to include the answers to questions that we, as a programme, are only begining to ask. I guess we’ll see were we’ve got to in April.

]]>