Paul Hollins » cetis-community http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1 Cetis Blog Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:21:46 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 A New Future for CETIS http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2012/12/20/a-new-future-for-cetis/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2012/12/20/a-new-future-for-cetis/#comments Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:21:46 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/?p=85 After over a decade of supporting Jisc innovation and projects a new future beckons for CETIS. Following the Wilson review of Jisc, the organisation has confirmed that it will continue to provide “core” funding to CETIS until July 2013. Since 1998 CETIS has established a global reputation in the fields of educational technology and interoperability, from July 2013 we will build on that reputation and work with other partners to ensure that interoperability is a key consideration for Universities and Colleges.

In response to the announcement close colleague and former chair of our Board, Professor Mark Stiles said:
“CETIS is recognised internationally as an invaluable centre of expertise. As universities struggle to address the very real challenges confronting them, CETIS will be an essential source of guidance and support. The need for universities to take an enterprise view of their information, not just for learning and teaching but also organisationally, will place standards and interoperability high on the national agenda, and I am confident that CETIS will be more than able to respond to this and become ever more successful. Whilst the Board has been wound up, its members, including myself, are committed to continuing to work with, and support, CETIS in its reborn form.”

We will continue to work with Jisc, and other agencies and organisations in the sector. Many of our partners see us as a “trusted” broker for information and future developments of educational technology and standards in education, and we aim to maintain that role. We are currently working with a number of our partners with a view to funding future activities.

Over the next seven months CETIS and Jisc will work together to develop a new relationship. We are also actively seeking out new collaboration opportunities with a range of stakeholders in the education sector and looking forward to maintaining and extending our valued position in national and international developments around the use of educational technology, interoperability and standards.

I’d like to take this opportunity to thank Jisc for supporting our work in the sector over the last decade and look forward to continuing to working together in key areas in future years.

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2012/12/20/a-new-future-for-cetis/feed/ 2
Higher Ambitions The Future of Universities in the Knowledge Economy http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/11/06/higher-ambitions-the-future-of-universities-in-the-knowledge-economy/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/11/06/higher-ambitions-the-future-of-universities-in-the-knowledge-economy/#comments Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:35:25 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/?p=38 I have just been digesting the content of “Higher Ambitions” the governments recently published ‘framework” for the future of Universities here in the UK.

The impact of this report will be significant in shaping future priorities and investment in the sector and as such will frame much of the activity that JISC and JISC CETIS will undertake over the coming years. If not framing future activity it will certainly frame the environment in which we operate. The document does outline useful observations, in particular, relating to work-based learning , business and community engagement and in anticipation of the changing student demographic. These are themes that have been explored by the JISC through it’s funding and development activities over the last few years and as such is a strong endorsement of the current JISC strategy.

Technology is highlighted as a key element of the sectors global competitiveness although those of us who remember the e-university project will proceed with some caution in pursuing these ambitious objectives. More concerning is, what I consider, an over emphasis on the STEM subjects seen as,to the detriment of arts and the humanities, the key to future economic growth and the implicit suggestion that the key metrics applied to determine the “quality” of education are employability or a “good” job (whatever that may be). The report fails to recognize the massive contribution the arts and humanities make to society, even using the preferred metrics of government , financial, the arts and humanities generate around 30% of research income for UK universities.

Somewhere the “joy” of learning as reward in itself is lost and there seems little recognition of the benefits, economic or otherwise, of subjects such as the classics. I’m mindful that many of our current crop of politicians ,received their political grounding in the classics and other theoretical subjects. Many of our celebrated entrepreneurs also received a “classical” education. The government recently appointed Martha Lane-Fox as head of digital inclusion, Martha is highly regarded as a vanguard for women in technology and her entrepreneurial skills and yes Martha studied “classical” History at Oxford; I’m sure that she would contest the value of her studies in helping shape her successful business career.

One hopes that we don’t loose sight of the bigger picture in education by sacrificing the arts, humanities and the classics in striving for the perceived and dubious short term economic benefits of business/employment related courses, do we even run the risk of “training” our students for jobs that may not exist?

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/11/06/higher-ambitions-the-future-of-universities-in-the-knowledge-economy/feed/ 1
Digital Inclusion what is the message ? http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/10/13/digital-inclusion-what-is-the-message/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/10/13/digital-inclusion-what-is-the-message/#comments Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:53:53 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/?p=36 I have been closely monitoring with interest the activities and ongoing debate in respect of the UK governments activities in respect of the digital inclusion agenda.

Being brutally honest with the appointment of dot com entrepreneur Martha Lane- Fox as “Digital inclusion Champion” I was initially concerned how “inclusive” the agenda would be given Ms Lane-Fox’s largely privileged background, and whilst the jury still remains out, I have been impressed with much of the work done thus far, this despite Martha’s occasional dip into “apple pie and mother statements”. Her personal enthusiasm for the role is evident and has significantly raised the profile of digital inclusion arguably the “lions share “ of the challenge facing us.

I read with interest this morning’s published data from PWC relating to the “benefits of getting everyone online in the UK are GBP22billion” and this has served to highlight some issues I have with the focus of the undertaking.

“>www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=268499

Perhaps I’m being a little disingenuous as I have not had the benefit of reading the whole of the PWC report but it does have the taint of many of those presented by management consultants, justifying their own role, importance and significance in the activity leading to the inevitable further commissioning of work.

The report does highlight the issue that over 10million adults across the UK have never used the internet and of these 4million are “socially excluded” a definition of which is not at present provided of this number (4million) 39% are over 65, 38% are unemployed and 19% families with children. In the draft there is no mention of those with disability or accessibility challenges which in itself is quite concerning. The report then goes further in presenting questionable data in respect of lifetime savings.

There is a real conflict in the duality of the aims and motivation in undertaking “Digital inclusion” activity. There is a compelling argument, no doubt supported by the treasury in these uncertain economic times, of ‘savings “ of GBP900million pounds in “customer contact costs” however they may be defined.

There are arguments and some data supporting the notion of the potential benefits accrued by those digitally included in society. We must when highlighting the benefits also equip, in a measured non alarmist way, the “included” with the critical skills required to mange the inherent risks and danger of online activity in a balanced way.

From my perspective there is one key word that seems to be missing form the report though I hope not the debate that of “choice”.

Digital inclusion should primarily be about choice, the informed choice of individuals how to participate (or not) in (digital) society.

Kevin Kelly talks about possessing the ability to “switch off” from the digital world to counteract arguments of technological determinism. If the inclusion strategy is about choice, widening accessibility, voluntary participation and improvement in the population’s digital literacy I’m fully behind it. If it is about compulsion to participate I’m not we (and the govt) need to be much clearer about this.

I’m sure that I would be classified as one of the digitally included and thankful I am but I choose not to use any number of digital services including Online banking, tax file systems, payment for local council services etc etc and I choose from a position of being informed. My father (one of the digitally excluded over 65’s mentioned in the report) chooses to be digitally excluded, despite my best efforts to provide him with technology and inform him of the benefits inclusion would bring to him. He chooses to walk to the post office to pay his council tax monthly as it, I quote, “gets me out of the house, I like to walk and meet my fiends on the way and in the post office”. these are his informed choices.

The primary motivation behind digital inclusion should be to provide access, educate inform and prepare citizens to improve levels of digital literacy alongside the ambitions to broaden access to the technology.

This should be done with honesty with the aim of providing all UK citizens with skills and ability to make informed choices to the extent, which they may wish to participate in (digital) society.

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2009/10/13/digital-inclusion-what-is-the-message/feed/ 1
JISC CETIS User Survey 2007 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/11/29/jisc-cetis-user-survey-2007/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/11/29/jisc-cetis-user-survey-2007/#comments Thu, 29 Nov 2007 08:35:00 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/11/29/jisc-cetis-user-survey-2007/ jisc-cetis-user-survey-report-2007-draft_md.doc

Thank you to all of you who responded to the JISC CETIS user survey conducted over the summer. The executive summary of the survey findings is available to download via this link.

The survey has identified areas in which we can improve our service to the community and these will be addressed in our forthcoming activities.

One specific area identified as requiring some attention was the old web site, recommendations for the site, drawn from the survey, were incorporated into the new version you are now accessing.

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/11/29/jisc-cetis-user-survey-2007/feed/ 0
JISC CETIS Conference 2007 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/02/04/jisc-cetis-conference-2007/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/02/04/jisc-cetis-conference-2007/#comments Sun, 04 Feb 2007 13:51:36 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/02/04/jisc-cetis-conference-2007/ Well it is official, there will be another JISC CETIS conference later this year. After conferences in Oxford, Edinburgh and Manchester the search is on for this year’s location with the early favourites being Birmingham and Manchester (again).

JISC CETIS Deputy Director Adam Cooper will be chairing the conference this year and is tasked with preparing the themes.

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/02/04/jisc-cetis-conference-2007/feed/ 0
Reflections on the Ten Competence Conference Manchester http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/01/18/reflections-on-the-ten-competence-conference-manchester/ http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/01/18/reflections-on-the-ten-competence-conference-manchester/#comments Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:13:22 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/01/18/reflections-on-the-ten-competence-conference-manchester/ I was fortunate enough to attend the Ten Competence http://www.tencompetence.org/

 project Conference at the G-Mex in Manchester last week.  There were a wide variety of speakers and presentations and I was particularily impressed with one of the final sessions including presentations by Mark Johnson, Graham Attwell and our own Scott Wilson. Scott has seemed to have grasped the torch in respect of Beer’s Viable Systems Model (VSM) applying it the complex educational field, I could sense Professor Oleg Liber at the back of the session beaming with approval. Grahams presentation served to remind us all why we are in education a rallying call for transformational change.
http://www.tencompetence.org/files/gmex/tenc-gmex-prog.pdf

Parallel session 10: Support for social engagement in Lifelong Competence Development: Chair Bill

Olivier

Designing systems for managing dynamic collaborative research processes, Scott Wilson, Ernie Ghiglione,

Yoichi Takayama, James Dalziel

Personal Technologies and Masks: Issues of Persona and Identity in Professional Practice and Learner

Development, Mark Johnson, Claire Brierley

Supporting Social Interaction in an “Intelligent” Competence Development System, Bertrand Sereno, Eleni

Boursinou, Albert Angehrn

Social Software, Personal Learning Environments and Lifelong Competence Development, Graham Attwell

]]>
http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/pah1/2007/01/18/reflections-on-the-ten-competence-conference-manchester/feed/ 1