Comments on: Personal publishing – effective use of networks or just noise? http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2011/03/16/personal-publishing-effective-use-of-networks-or-just-noise/ Cetis blog Mon, 07 Oct 2013 10:54:02 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.22 By: lasem art http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2011/03/16/personal-publishing-effective-use-of-networks-or-just-noise/#comment-1614 Sun, 24 Apr 2011 13:30:07 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/?p=726#comment-1614 this is my first visit and i like your blogs, very informative. thanks

]]>
By: Sheilamacneill http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2011/03/16/personal-publishing-effective-use-of-networks-or-just-noise/#comment-1613 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:38:08 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/?p=726#comment-1613 Hi David/James

Thanks for the commments. Kind of horses for courses in terms of what works best for catching up with things. I use netvibes to aggregate blogs I regularly follow, but the paper.li does through up the serendipitous links relatively regularly.

]]>
By: dkernohan http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2011/03/16/personal-publishing-effective-use-of-networks-or-just-noise/#comment-1612 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:57:03 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/?p=726#comment-1612 Phipps – if you want to get into Sheila’s paper, you’re going to to have to start linking to and creating interesting content rather than just moaning about people on trains! :-)

Seriously, it does look like an interesting way to catch up on key stuff your twitter friends are talking about (I think it chooses stories based on the frequency of references in your f-stream? not sure). I’ve not used it as I’m a big google reader fan and tend to subscribe to blogs willy-nilly, so catch up with things that way.

]]>
By: James Clay http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/2011/03/16/personal-publishing-effective-use-of-networks-or-just-noise/#comment-1611 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:15:47 +0000 http://blogs.cetis.org.uk/sheilamacneill/?p=726#comment-1611 I like the concept of paper.li, same reasons I like Flipboard on the iPad. However I didn’t like the mentions, so I opted out. Still read paper.li now and again.

James

]]>