Comments on: Binding explained . . . in a little over 140 characters

By: What I’ve starred this month: July 28, 2012 JISC CETIS MASHe

What I’ve starred this month: July 28, 2012 JISC CETIS MASHe — Sat, 28 Jul 2012 20:02:29 +0000

[…] Sheila’s work blog » Binding explained . . . in a little over 140 characters – July 11, 2012 […]

By: Sheilamacneill

Sheilamacneill — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:56:30 +0000

Hi Irvin

Yes, this isn’t formal specification bindings, but as a first step to understand the principles behind linking data structures between systems, I still think this is a useful explanation.

Sheila

By: Irvin

Irvin — Thu, 05 Jul 2012 03:57:54 +0000

But this is a different sort of ‘binding’ to the one LOM means in its binding standard http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/par1484-12-3.html (ie a representation in XML, etc of metadata), no?

By: Lorna

Lorna — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:03:19 +0000

I like it! Definitely one of the best explanations of bindings I’ve come across for a while.

By: Rachel Forsyth

Rachel Forsyth — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:24:16 +0000

I hope I did understand it! For other readers, the main issue here is to be able to distinguish the summation elements of assessment from which we want to extract marks (and feedback if we can) for re-use (copy of marks to definitive student record system (SRS), feedback to personal turtles?), from other formative assessments which may take place in the VLE and which should not be transferred to the SRS.